
Sen. Hillary Clinton, increasingly desperate to overtake Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination, ripped into her opponent today for failing to support universal pet health insurance should he reach the White House.
"It's a shame for Sen. Obama to claim he backs health care for all, when in fact his plan would not only leave 15 million Americans uninsured, but hundreds of millions of innocent dogs, cats, birds, fish, turtles and other non-human family members of our society as well," Clinton charged at a press conference today.
"The glaring lack of health insurance for the overwhelming majority of our pets is nothing less than a national disgrace," declared Clinton. "We cannot in good conscience allow this travesty to go on unaddressed any longer."
Clinton charged that under an Obama presidency, "this country will go to the dogs."
Clinton emphasized that under her scheme, all pet owners would be mandated to purchase coverage. Standard health insurers would be required to include veterinary care and prescription drug benefits for pets under family coverage.
Those owners who cannot afford the extra cost would be eligible for government subsidies, financed by a surtax on wealthy pet owners.
However, those who could afford coverage, but who fail to buy it, would be subject to arrest and have their pets handed over to Ellen DeGeneres, who appeared with Clinton to announce that as her campaign contribution, she has agreed to take care of every pet left uninsured under the Clinton plan.
"It's the least I can do to make up for my shameful behavior when I adopted a pet and irresponsibly turned it over to some child without authorization," said the popular TV host, between sobs. "If this can help put Hillary Clinton in the White House, then count me in."
Obama insisted that Clinton had once again distorted his position, contending that he, too, would include pets under his health care reform plan. However, unlike his opponent, he swore he would not mandate coverage. "We all love our pets, but having Big Brother mandate health coverage for them would spell doom for the Democratic Party in the fall elections," he predicted.
Instead, Obama said his plan would help cover the cost of premiums by allowing owners to list all pets as dependents on their federal income tax returns.
"Most people do this anyway, either in good faith, out of legitimate ignorance or in trying to game the system," he said. "Why not let these poor pet owners come out of the shadows and have Uncle Sam treat their non-human family members with the same dignity and tax status as all Americans?"
Obama supporter Oprah Winfrey also entered the fray, vowing on her own TV show to give away free pet health insurance to every studio audience member for as long as she is on the air. "I will do whatever it takes to make sure Barack Obama is elected president," she said. "I will not permit Sen. Clinton to demagogue her way to the White House on the backs of our innocent dogs and cats."
The Republican Party's nominee, Sen. John McCain, blasted both candidates for attempting to "socialize" pet health insurance, vowing to instead support a market-based solution by creating tax-deferred PMSAs--Pet Medical Savings Accounts--to help cover veterinary care and drug costs.
He also suggested that pet owners band together in a Risk Purchasing Group to make coverage more affordable--or to form an offshore captive, as he has done to finance his own pets' health care.
"Since I do not support government-mandated health insurance for my human constituents, it would not be prudent to do so for animals, who, after all, can't even vote," said the straight-talkin' McCain. "I love my doggie as much as the next guy, but creating yet another government entitlement program is not the answer."
However, McCain conceded he might make an exception and grant government-supplied health insurance for military pets by adding free veterinary care in VA hospitals around the country. "Whatever it takes to support the troops," he said.
What do you people make of all this??? Has the campaign finally gone too far???
HAPPY APRIL FOOL'S DAY!!!

Comments (11)
Well done, Sam!
This reminds me of the year when NPR did an entire 10-minute "news" story on April Fools Day about the U.S. selling Arizona to Canada to pay off the national debt. Thanks for the morning laugh!
Posted by Tim Dodge, Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of New York | April 1, 2008 8:07 AM
Posted on April 1, 2008 08:07
YOU GOT ME!! I was just about to throw in the towel on any reason and sanity left in the world. Nice job!
Posted by David | April 1, 2008 10:10 AM
Posted on April 1, 2008 10:10
This may be the best post yet!
Sad to say it but I could see the candidates debating this.
What a country!
Posted by Dave | April 1, 2008 10:20 AM
Posted on April 1, 2008 10:20
Not nearly far enough!
What about the pets who have no owners to collect the insurance benefits for them? What will happen to them? Where will they go? The VA Hospital? Not likely.
I think both candidates need to think this through very carefully and come up with a plan that costs absolutely nothing and covers absolutely everything.
And if they don't, I'll be staying home in November (well, not the whole month, because i do have to walk the dog, but just Election day).
And, by the way, I happen to know that McCain doesn't even have a dog. It's a prop he rented for the campaign.
Pets rule!
Posted by Jerry | April 1, 2008 10:27 AM
Posted on April 1, 2008 10:27
Good one Sam! The headline and first sentence got me ...
Posted by Charles Wasilewski | April 1, 2008 10:28 AM
Posted on April 1, 2008 10:28
It wasn't until Ellen DeGeneris that I caught on. Literally, my eyes were getting wider and wider and I started to get outraged over pets being handed over.
If you're a Democrat, you're the only one who ever pulled the wool over my eyes! Bravo!!
Posted by Maire | April 1, 2008 11:33 AM
Posted on April 1, 2008 11:33
You had me going, Sam! I was spitting and sputtering the whole way through--"This is ridiculous......blah, blah"...
I totally forgot it was April Fool's Day! Good laugh!!
Posted by Carolyn McNamara | April 1, 2008 11:54 AM
Posted on April 1, 2008 11:54
Bravo, Sam!
Have you noticed that April Fools stories involving presidential politics are not quite implausible anymore?
It doesn't take much suspension of disbelief to think that this account could be true and not a parody.
I suggest you hang on to this blog entry and check it against the "real" news in a few weeks. There's a chance it may come true.
Posted by Ted Besesparis | April 1, 2008 12:53 PM
Posted on April 1, 2008 12:53
Sam, I'm glad to see our discussion about the pet (insurance) patent (US 7,246,070 B2) for bundling pet health insurance onto health and or homeowners policies may still have been lurking in the back of your mind and synapses(?).
P.S. Clinton chief honcho adviser and pollster Mark Penn in his book Microtrends has a section on pet parents and the fact that there are 200 percent more dogs and cats in U.S. households than kids. And that ain't an April Fool's joke...
Posted by Jim Schwartz | April 1, 2008 5:42 PM
Posted on April 1, 2008 17:42
Ted's right, Sam--I'm reading this the day after, and falling for it to the end.
Your idea and presentation were both brilliant--and entirely plausible in what passes for political camaigning these days.
Posted by Charlie | April 2, 2008 7:02 AM
Posted on April 2, 2008 07:02
It was a joke?
Between the dictates of the Socialist Queen Hillary and NYC's Nanny Mayor Bloomberg, your blog had a ring of truth to it!
Posted by Jack J. Maniscalco | April 2, 2008 9:34 AM
Posted on April 2, 2008 09:34