« Playing Games With The Industry's Reputation | Main | Duperreault A Good Bet To Get MMC Back On Track »

Florida Buries Rudy Despite Cat Fund Support

Rudy.jpg
Sen. John McCain buried Rudy Giuliani’s presidential hopes in Florida last night, despite the winner’s adamant opposition and the loser’s vocal support on whether to establish a national catastrophe fund. What does the primary vote mean for cat fund backers? Vote Democratic!

If Sen. McCain is elected President, Florida, Louisiana, California and other states vulnerable to massive windstorm or earthquake losses can forget about seeing the cat fund idea being pushed by Allstate and its lobbyist, ProtectingAmerica.org, ever coming to fruition.

Rudy ran hard on the idea of establishing a national cat fund to back up state property insurance facilities, even though he claims to be against government intrusion into the private market. For example, despite the fact that some 50 million Americans lack health insurance, while tens of millions of others struggle to make premium or co-payments, Rudy mocks calls for a national health insurance system. Yet he saw no contradiction in calling for a national catastrophe insurance fund.

Meanwhile, straight-talkin' John McCain resisted the temptation to pander for Florida's crucial primary votes, stating emphatically that a national cat fund is not the answer to the state's property insurance woes.

"I do understand the problem and I do know how FEMA has to be fixed, and it has to be fixed so that we can perform the rightful role of government, which is to help people whenever there is a natural or manmade disaster or catastrophe," Sen. McCain told the Florida Sun-Sentinel on Jan. 23.

He said he would vote against HR 3355, the “Homeowners Defense Act of 2007,” sponsored by a pair of Florida Democrats in the U.S. House (Reps. Ron Klein and Tim Mahoney), adding that the bill has no chance of passing the U.S. Senate--something I have said for two years now.

Mr. Giuliani tried to capitalize on Sen. McCain's unpopular stance in one of his TV ads.

"Some say we don't need a national catastrophe fund--that FEMA can handle disasters," the announcer says. "Others say they haven't looked at it yet and want to sit down with insurance companies first." Heaven forbid!

Meanwhile, Mitt Romney did what he does best--talk out of both sides of his mouth--stating that while "the cat fund makes sense to me," he doesn't want a truly national disaster insurance plan because that would mean "very low-risk homeowners, or low-risk states, subsidizing high-risk homeowners or high-risk states." He wants a regional plan instead--which pretty much mirrors Sen. McCain's most recent musings on the subject.

In any case, Sen. McCain's firm opposition to the cat fund idea did not cost him politically, which shows you the issue has lost its potency after two quiet hurricane seasons. American voters have a short memory indeed.

In fact, despite his position on the cat fund, Sen. McCain managed to secure the 11th hour endorsement of Gov. Charlie Crist (talk about jumping on the bandwagon!), and crushed Rudy, most likely driving the former New York mayor out of the race. Mr. Romney came in second, but Sen. McCain clearly has the momentum now going into Super Tuesday.

That means the best bet--indeed, perhaps the only hope--for those backing a national cat fund is to vote Democratic in November, as Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both say they support the concept. Fat chance, right?

However, don't write the cat fund off as a political factor just yet. If another major hurricane hits the U.S. mainland between now and Election Day, and Sen. McCain sticks to his stand against a national cat fund, that could conceivably cost him Florida in the general election. If he loses Florida, he almost certainly can forget about the White House.

What do you folks think?


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://property-casualty.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/307

Comments (2)

Anonymous:

I favor the federal government's continuing to subsidize National Flood Insurance, FEMA services, and other emergency programs.

And I would like to see a national cat fund with monies passed through to regional authorities rather than maintained by the feds.

With regard to premium, why not also have a regional rating basis tied to regional characteristics?

I happen to dwell where there are no hurricanes, no floods and no twisters. Should I be penalized and subsidize those who choose to live in areas that do have hurricanes, do have floods and do have twisters? I think not...

Craig Dolan:

Health insurance is clearly a national issue. The problem with losses of catastrophic nature in the coastal states is just that, it is not a national issue.

State issues should be handled by the state. National issues should be handled by the federal government. Rudy clearly showed his lack of national experience as he was thinking on a state basis.

This is the same logic when one says that no state court should determine class-action lawsuits that affect multiple states. These should be the venue of the federal courts.

If the coastal states want to form a regional fund, I have no issue with that idea. I do resent having to pay for this as I chose not to live in those areas primarily for those reasons.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 30, 2008 8:09 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Playing Games With The Industry's Reputation.

The next post in this blog is Duperreault A Good Bet To Get MMC Back On Track.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.32