« The Comeback Kids | Main | NU Seeks Agency Tech Success Stories »

'Do We Look Euphoric?'

2_Quicksand2.jpg
It was a rather glum group of CEOs that gathered in New York this week for the annual family reunion of top insurance company and association executives, as all the tea leaves seem to indicate insurers have about as much chance of improving the top- and bottom lines this year as Ron Paul has of becoming President of the United States.

Indeed, in the only light moment of an otherwise grim panel discussion about the difficult year ahead for carriers and their producers, an audience member stood up during the Q&A and complained that insurers had no right to be “euphoric” about achieving a 14 percent rate of return last year, even if that was far better than the single-digit results normally posted, because it still trailed broader industry benchmarks.

“Do we really look euphoric to you,” deadpanned Ramani Ayer, chairman and CEO of The Hartford, drawing hearty laughter from those attending the Property-Casualty Insurance Joint Industry Forum.

Mr. Ayer’s quip amounted to gallows humor, as the panel laid out the formidable challenges ahead. For full coverage of the panelists' frank assessments on the state of the market, click here. Or stay right here and read on for a summary of what p-c insurers and their brokers have to look forward to in 2008:

--The top line will suffer, as commercial lines prices keep falling for all but catastrophe-prone areas. Only 4 percent of those surveyed at the forum foresee any growth in premiums for the year. Nearly two-thirds (62 percent) anticipate “flat” results, while 34 percent predicted that industry-wide premium volume will actually decline.

--The bottom line will erode, with 92 percent expecting a higher combined ratio in 2008. By more than a three-to-one margin, attendees do not expect any improvement in personal or commercial lines profitability.

--The economy will keep weakening, and perhaps even devolve into a full-fledged recession, which will slow exposure growth and perhaps spur a hike in the frequency of workers' comp claims and fraud as thousands more are laid off. If the recession goes global, the impact on insurance will be that much tougher to take.

--Investment income will fall along with interest rates, while a volatile stock market makes equities a riskier bet to offset premium deterioration.

--The dollar will keep falling, leaving U.S. insurers, reinsurers and brokerages vulnerable to takeovers by bargain-hunting foreign firms.

--Insurers will be squeezed like Silly Putty by competing pressure points, as analysts push for growth in a down market, shareholders demand better returns or their capital back, rating agencies discourage irrational rate-cutting to maintain market share despite greater competition, and brokers shop furiously for lower prices to keep their clients happy in a buyers' market. Good luck with that!

Of course, carriers are also holding their breath that we don't get hit with another massive catastrophe (or two, or three, or four) after two blissfully quiet years. Most insurers and their associations would much rather argue with Bob Hunter of the Consumer Federation of America over whether they are making too much money than have to lay out tens of billions to rebuild another state hammered by Mother Nature.

Meanwhile, as if times weren't looking bad enough (at least from an insurance industry perspective), 72 percent of those surveyed at the forum predicted that a Democrat would win the White House on Election Day. That alone would put a frown on the face of the most happy-go-lucky insurance exec, with the vast majority preferring elephants to donkeys as their political pets of choice.

Before you do anything foolish, keep in mind that much like insurance itself, the industry's mood is cyclical. It wasn't all that long ago that I found the leadership of this business in a similar funk. Indeed, I recall writing something to the effect that if the Joint Industry Forum that year would have played a theme song, it would have been "It's My Party, And I'll Cry If I Want To."

This, too, shall pass. In the meantime, insurers should be heartened by the fact that balance sheets are in good shape, the industry is enjoying record profitability, and most carriers have more capital than they know what to do with. (That's not bad for an industry supposedly hard put to raise money because of its historically low rate of return).

What do you folks think?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://property-casualty.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/295

Comments (4)

BJ:

From my experience, I've noted a very heavy investment in technology over the past four or five years, as companies attempted to remain one step ahead of each other in competition for agency as well as "online" business.

Many are now facing the financial takedown for that huge investment, some of which never paid off in the manner they hoped it would.

Other carriers had what appeared to be one or two banner years with huge dividends paid, only to be faced in late 2007 and now 2008 with much poorer financials, and investors who expect the high double-digit returns of past years that just will be unrealized.

As Sam pointed out, the business is certainly cyclical. Unfortunately, we've seen some very long down cycles, more in the last 15 years or so than in the 30 years preceding as I recall. Just the nature of the beast.

At least none of us has been subject to divestiture as has Chrysler this past year, so maybe there is light at the end of the tunnel.

Of course, the last time I said I saw a light at the end of the tunnel, it was from a runaway locomotive coming my way.....

Anonymous:

The word 'dichotomy' is one of my favorites (must have something to do with my split personality).

In the middle of your articles, there is the same old song and dance by Bob Hunter and the CFA, rehashing the same old misinformation and talking about a 19% ROE.

Sam's blog (the more trustworthy source) tells about insurance execs griping about a 14% ROE.

Which is it?

Mr. Hunter trots out the anti-concurrent-causation clause. There is a time for every season under heaven (turn, turn, turn).

Bob, please let this issue die a (somewhat) natural death. Its' usefulness as an example in debate has long since passed! Certainly, you must be able to get a grip on something new and exciting!

FJL:

As an independent adjuster over the past 16 months I have seen claim positions vanish, causing additional burdens on an already overburdened staff, the untimely return of telephone calls to claims staff (if they are returned at all), excessively late claim payments, and unsound claim practices to reduce claim payments (more prevalent in non-ISO writers).

From a claims perspective, I must concur with the Consumer Federation of America report.

Our current crop of industry leaders is focused on ROE, seemingly losing vision of our core product,which is providing equitable service at a fair price.

We must not let this issue die.

Philip Lieberman :

Having lived (and worked) through an endless number of these cycles, the refrain is always the same from carrier CEOs: "We must maintain underwriting discipline!" "Let's not make the same mistake as last time."

I just can't comprehend the seemingly magical force that permeates the branch offices of insurance companies that drives them to keep dropping rates to seek ever more volume.

I always thought discipline originates from the Ivory Tower. Could it be that these CEOs talk a good game but have no intention of forgoing what look to be easy profits?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 10, 2008 4:55 PM.

The previous post in this blog was The Comeback Kids.

The next post in this blog is NU Seeks Agency Tech Success Stories.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.32